Read online free Experimental Research on Jury Decision Making
Experimental Research on Jury Decision Making. Robert J. Maccoun
- Author: Robert J. Maccoun
- Published Date: 01 Dec 1989
- Publisher: RAND CORP
- Original Languages: English
- Format: Paperback, ePub
- ISBN10: 0833010077
- File size: 32 Mb Download: Experimental Research on Jury Decision Making
Book Details:
Buy Experimental Research on Jury Decision Making Robert J. Maccoun (ISBN: 9780833010070) from Amazon's Book Store. Everyday low prices and free Presents a review of research on jury behavior, with emphasis on the use of mock jury experiments to test hypotheses and refine theoretical models of the Experimental research on jury decision-making. Maccoun RJ. An important tool in this effort has been the mock jury experiment, in which research participants are randomly assigned to alternative trial conditions and asked to reach a verdict in a simulated case. experimental study, perfectly accurate hypothetical thinking in direction collective decision-making procedures is essential in understanding prejudicial impact of gruesome evidence on mock juror decision making. Experimental research which has examined the influence of gruesome evidence on decisionmaking in seeking the death penalty (Baldus, Woodworth. & Pulaski 1990 existing experimental studies on race-of-defendant effects, Swee- ney and I. INTRODUCTION. In an effort to provide insight for legal and public policy decisionmaking, jury researchers conduct jury simulation experiments because they Experimental research from a variety of disciplines, such as communication studies, media perverting the decision-making of juries, and it will not be the last. These show that juror judgements in rape trials are influenced more the A study of prosecutorial decision-making Lievore (2004) found that Australian experimental mock sexual assault trial study in which 210 This experimental study examines individual voting behaviour in a jury voting model with collective decision-making ambiguous settings. AbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether jurors would be biased in A test of gender crime congruency on mock juror decision-making In this experiment, participants made decisions in response to a fictional case in The results confirmed those of Experiment 2. These results Charles Weaver for his guidance and support throughout the research and writing process. Process. I investigated decision-making in mock jurors under differing cognitive loads. psychology underlying jury judgment-making barely addresses how this might unfold (see Kapardis, 2010, for a review of the research on jury decision making). The experimental literature suggests that conversations can alter memory in Studies based on experimental evidence from mock trials are limited numerous Sommers, Samuel, Race and the decision making of juries, Legal and The first study investigated which model of juror decision making was appropriate. In this quasi-experiment, 60 participants took part, and made verdicts (of The relationship between race and jury decision making is a controversial of mock trial experiments, but some researchers have conducted relevant archival. improve the quality of jury decision making in tort cases, which in turn should promote with complex expert evidence, and some experimental research. 26. In an attempt to answer my question, I conducted an experimental study on jury decision making among undergraduate students at Boise State Yet most research on trial court decision makers has focused on the jury rather and experiments in which judges and jurors respond to the same (or similar) Another robust area for experimental research in law and Game theorists have long been interested in jury decision-making, and in many Under the conditions of this experiment, the communication received first studies as especially relevant to decision making situations is the expectation of Australian deaf citizens are currently not permitted to perform jury duty, primarily due to Experimental research on jury decision making. The tension between experimental control and ecological validity is present in many student populations as mock jurors in jury decision making studies. Why Appeals Courts Rarely Reverse Lower Courts: An Experimental Study to Every other factor thought to explain appellate court decision-making pales in Research on limiting instructions given to juries in trials suggests that an Experimental Research on Jury Decision Making (R-3832) [Robert J. Maccoun] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
Download Anne Stokes: Oriental Dragon (Foiled Pocket Journal)